Sebastian Ofner vs Mirko Cutuli, Doha 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 14 Dec

Final

Sebastian Ofner

WinnerRank #122

Ofner won in 2 sets · 1h 27m

2–0

Set 17–6⁶

Set 26–3

Mirko Cutuli

LostRank #1753

Venue

Khalifa International Tennis and Squash Complex

Doha, QAT· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 27m

5Aces1

7Double faults5

46Service points won37

10Service games played11

8Service games won7

11Return games played10

6/875%Break points saved0%0/4

4/4100%Break points converted25%2/8

Head to head

1Ofner

0Cutuli

1 meeting

DohaRound of 16 · 14 Dec 2016HardThis match
Sebastian Ofner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 6
Mirko Cutuli
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sebastian Ofner vs Mirko Cutuli, Doha 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research