Attila Balazs vs Loic Perret, Hammamet 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Sun 11 Dec

Final

Attila Balazs

WinnerRank #1079

Balazs won in 2 sets · 1h 13m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–3

Loic Perret

LostRank #1438

Venue

Hotel Sentido Phenicia

Hammamet, TUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

80%

Humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 13m

4Aces0

2Double faults0

31Service points won20

9Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played9

1/333%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

1Balazs

0Perret

1 meeting

HammametSemifinal · 11 Dec 2016ClayThis match
Attila Balazs
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Loic Perret
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Attila Balazs vs Loic Perret, Hammamet 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research