Enzo Couacaud vs Lingxi Zhao, Jakarta 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 2 Dec

Final

Enzo Couacaud

WinnerRank #1176

Couacaud won in 2 sets · 42m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Lingxi Zhao

LostRank #1872

Venue

Sultan Hotel Tennis Court

Jakarta, INA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

85%

Very humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

42m

3Aces0

1Double faults3

26Service points won17

7Service games played8

5Service games won1

8Return games played7

1/333%Break points saved36%4/11

7/1164%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

1Couacaud

0Zhao

1 meeting

JakartaQuarterfinal · 2 Dec 2016HardThis match
Enzo Couacaud
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lingxi Zhao
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Enzo Couacaud vs Lingxi Zhao, Jakarta 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research