Rishab Agarwal vs Lingxi Zhao, Jakarta 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 1 Dec

Final

Rishab Agarwal

LostRank #1814

Zhao won in 2 sets · 2h 4m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–7⁴

Lingxi Zhao

WinnerRank #1872

Venue

Sultan Hotel Tennis Court

Jakarta, INA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

82%

Humid

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 4m

2Aces6

4Double faults5

52Service points won62

11Service games played11

10Service games won11

11Return games played11

2/367%Break points saved100%9/9

0/90%Break points converted33%1/3

Head to head

0Agarwal

1Zhao

1 meeting

JakartaRound of 16 · 1 Dec 2016HardThis match
Lingxi Zhao
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Rishab Agarwal
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Rishab Agarwal vs Lingxi Zhao, Jakarta 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research