Alexandar Lazov vs Nerman Fatic, Antalya 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 25 Nov

Final

Alexandar Lazov

WinnerRank #1727

Lazov won in 2 sets · 1h 29m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–3

Nerman Fatic

LostRank #588

Venue

Hotel Kaya Belek

Belek, TUR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 29m

0Aces1

1Double faults1

36Service points won35

10Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played10

3/650%Break points saved58%7/12

5/1242%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Lazov

0Fatic

1 meeting

AntalyaQuarterfinal · 25 Nov 2016HardThis match
Alexandar Lazov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nerman Fatic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Alexandar Lazov vs Nerman Fatic, Antalya 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research