Kenneth Raisma vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Pärnu 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 11 Nov

Final

Kenneth Raisma

LostRank #1782

Zandschulp won in 2 sets · 1h 15m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 23–6

Botic Van De Zandschulp

WinnerRank #37

Venue

Pärnu Tennis Centre

Pärnu, EST· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

5 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 15m

5Aces6

3Double faults4

49Service points won36

10Service games played9

7Service games won9

9Return games played10

16/1984%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted16%3/19

Head to head

0Raisma

1Zandschulp

1 meeting

PärnuSemifinal · 11 Nov 2016HardThis match
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kenneth Raisma
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kenneth Raisma vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Pärnu 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research