Frederik Nielsen vs Jonny O'Mara, Sheffield 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 4 Nov

Final

Frederik Nielsen

WinnerRank #1346

Nielsen won in 3 sets · 2h 2m

2–1

Set 12–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–4

Jonny O'Mara

LostUnranked

Venue

Graves Tennis and Leisure Centre

Sheffield, GBR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

189 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 2m

5Aces6

2Double faults5

56Service points won53

14Service games played13

11Service games won10

13Return games played14

7/1070%Break points saved67%6/9

3/933%Break points converted30%3/10

Head to head

1Nielsen

0O'Mara

1 meeting

SheffieldSemifinal · 4 Nov 2016HardThis match
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jonny O'Mara
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Frederik Nielsen vs Jonny O'Mara, Sheffield 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research