Collin Johns vs Thomas Setodji, Stellenbosch 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 3 Nov

Final

Collin Johns

LostRank #1456

Setodji won in 2 sets · 1h 23m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Thomas Setodji

WinnerUnranked

Venue

Maties Tennis Club

Stellenbosch, RSA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

117 m

Low

Match stats

1h 23m

0Aces4

2Double faults2

25Service points won39

9Service games played8

4Service games won7

8Return games played9

3/838%Break points saved88%7/8

1/813%Break points converted63%5/8

Head to head

0Johns

1Setodji

1 meeting

StellenboschRound of 16 · 3 Nov 2016HardThis match
Thomas Setodji
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Collin Johns
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Collin Johns vs Thomas Setodji, Stellenbosch 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research