Michal Schmid vs Patrik Nema, Opava 2016, Round of 16

Final

Michal Schmid

LostATP: 1158

Nema won in 2 sets · 53m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Patrik Nema

WinnerATP: 1708

Tennis Center OpavaOpava, CZE

Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

107.4Fast

Altitude255 mLow

Match stats

53m

2Aces7

2Double faults1

29Service points won37

8Service games played9

5Service games won9

9Return games played8

2/540%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted60%3/5

Head to head

0Schmid

1Nema

1 meeting

OpavaRound of 16 · 27 Oct 2016CarpetThis match
Patrik Nema
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michal Schmid
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michal Schmid vs Patrik Nema, Opava 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research