Roberto Ortega Olmedo vs Austin Smith, Burlingame 2016, Round of 32

Final

Roberto Ortega Olmedo

WinnerATP: 1340

Olmedo won in 3 sets · 2h 3m

2–1

Set 16–2

Set 24–6

Set 36–1

Austin Smith

LostATP: 1608

Broadway Tennis Center / Bay Club BroadwayBurlingame, USA

Indoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

97.2Average

Altitude2 mSea level

Match stats

2h 3m

4Aces9

7Double faults6

43Service points won54

12Service games played13

9Service games won6

13Return games played12

1/425%Break points saved70%16/23

7/2330%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

1Olmedo

0Smith

1 meeting

BurlingameRound of 32 · 25 Oct 2016HardThis match
Roberto Ortega Olmedo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Austin Smith
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 1

Form and path

Roberto Ortega Olmedo

No recent matches recorded.

Austin Smith2–2

BerkeleyHard

Ramat HaSharonHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Roberto Ortega Olmedo vs Austin Smith, Burlingame 2016, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research