Joao Menezes vs Raleigh Smith, Quito 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 12 Oct

Final

Joao Menezes

LostRank #1471

Smith won in 3 sets · 2h 33m

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–3

Set 35–7

Raleigh Smith

WinnerRank #1465

Venue

Quito Tenis y Golf Club

Quito, ECU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

2702 m

Very high

Match stats

2h 33m

8Aces3

5Double faults2

62Service points won62

16Service games played15

13Service games won13

15Return games played16

4/757%Break points saved60%3/5

2/540%Break points converted43%3/7

Head to head

0Menezes

1Smith

1 meeting

QuitoRound of 16 · 12 Oct 2016ClayThis match
Raleigh Smith
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Joao Menezes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Joao Menezes vs Raleigh Smith, Quito 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research