Edward Corrie vs Jurgen Zopp, Falun 2016, Quarterfinal

Final

Edward Corrie

WinnerATP: 1368

Corrie won in 2 sets · 1h 18m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–4

Jurgen Zopp

LostATP: 1406

Falu TennisklubbFalun, SWE

Indoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

102.5Average

Altitude161 mLow

Match stats

1h 18m

4Aces2

2Double faults7

35Service points won31

9Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played9

0/10%Break points saved56%5/9

4/944%Break points converted100%1/1

Head to head

3Corrie

0Zopp

3 meetings

FalunQuarterfinal · 6 Oct 2016HardThis match
Edward Corrie
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jurgen Zopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
JönköpingFinal · 2014Hard
Edward Corrie
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jurgen Zopp
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 3
FalunSemifinal · 2014Hard
Edward Corrie
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jurgen Zopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Edward Corrie vs Jurgen Zopp, Falun 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research