Raymond Sarmiento vs Hugo Grenier, Sarreguemines 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Carpet · Sat 1 Oct

Final

Raymond Sarmiento

WinnerRank #1004

Sarmiento won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

2–0

Set 17–6⁴

Set 26–4

Hugo Grenier

LostRank #403

Venue

AS Sarreguemines Tennis

Sarreguemines, FRA· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

201 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 30m

2Aces5

2Double faults2

54Service points won48

11Service games played11

10Service games won9

11Return games played11

3/475%Break points saved60%3/5

2/540%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Sarmiento

0Grenier

1 meeting

SarregueminesSemifinal · 1 Oct 2016CarpetThis match
Raymond Sarmiento
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Hugo Grenier
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Raymond Sarmiento vs Hugo Grenier, Sarreguemines 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research