Yannick Mertens vs Hugo Grenier, Plaisir 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 23 Sept

Final

Yannick Mertens

WinnerRank #1230

Mertens won in 3 sets · 2h 22m

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 21–6

Set 37–6⁴

Hugo Grenier

LostRank #403

Venue

Tennis Club de Plaisir

Plaisir, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

118 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 22m

8Aces6

7Double faults5

58Service points won70

14Service games played15

11Service games won13

15Return games played14

3/650%Break points saved78%7/9

2/922%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Mertens

0Grenier

1 meeting

PlaisirQuarterfinal · 23 Sept 2016HardThis match
Yannick Mertens
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7⁷
Hugo Grenier
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Yannick Mertens vs Hugo Grenier, Plaisir 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research