Joe Salisbury vs Hunter Tubert, Columbus Challenger 2016, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 17 Sept

Final

Joe Salisbury

LostRank #1075

Tubert won in 2 sets · 1h 23m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 25–7

Hunter Tubert

WinnerUnranked

Venue

Tennis Ohio

Columbus, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

247 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 23m

3Aces1

4Double faults1

34Service points won39

10Service games played10

5Service games won8

10Return games played10

5/1050%Break points saved50%2/4

2/450%Break points converted50%5/10

Head to head

0Salisbury

1Tubert

1 meeting

Columbus ChallengerQualifying R1 · 17 Sept 2016HardThis match
Hunter Tubert
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Joe Salisbury
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Joe Salisbury vs Hunter Tubert, Columbus Challenger 2016, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research