Vladimir Uzhylovsky vs Nathaniel Lammons, Ashkelon 2016, Quarterfinal

Final

Vladimir Uzhylovsky

LostATP: 1791

Lammons won in 3 sets · 2h 5m

1–2

Set 16–3

Set 24–6

Set 31–6

Nathaniel Lammons

WinnerATP: 1733

Ashkelon Tennis CenterAshkelon, ISR

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

3.294.9Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

29°CWarm

14km/hGentle

74%Humid

35mSea level

Match stats

2h 5m

4Aces6

7Double faults1

51Service points won48

13Service games played13

8Service games won10

13Return games played13

8/1362%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted38%5/13

Head to head

0Uzhylovsky

1Lammons

1 meeting

AshkelonQuarterfinal · 16 Sept 2016HardThis match
Nathaniel Lammons
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vladimir Uzhylovsky vs Nathaniel Lammons, Ashkelon 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research