N Sriram Balaji vs Mukund Sasikumar, Chennai 2016, Semifinal

Final

N Sriram Balaji

WinnerATP: 1303

Balaji won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–4

Mukund Sasikumar

LostATP: 746

Madras Cricket ClubChennai, IND

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

1.698.4Average

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

34°CHot

17km/hGentle

72%Humid

11mSea level

Match stats

1h 19m

4Aces3

3Double faults5

39Service points won34

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

6/786%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted14%1/7

Head to head

2Balaji

0Sasikumar

2 meetings

ChennaiSemifinal · 9 Sept 2016ClayThis match
N Sriram Balaji
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mukund Sasikumar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
MaduraiRound of 32 · 2014Clay
N Sriram Balaji
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Mukund Sasikumar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

N Sriram Balaji vs Mukund Sasikumar, Chennai 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research