Peter Torebko vs Oscar Otte, Überlingen 2016, Semifinal

Final

Peter Torebko

LostATP: 1478

Otte won in 3 sets · 1h 52m

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–4

Set 31–6

Oscar Otte

WinnerATP: 1284

TC ÜberlingenÜberlingen, GER

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

0.792.6Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

30°CWarm

7km/hLight

71%Humid

399mModerate

Match stats

1h 52m

3Aces3

1Double faults4

44Service points won52

13Service games played14

8Service games won11

14Return games played13

2/729%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted71%5/7

Head to head

1Torebko

1Otte

2 meetings

Clay 0–1Hard 1–0

ÜberlingenSemifinal · 27 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Oscar Otte
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Peter Torebko
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
EssenRound of 32 · 2013Hard
Peter Torebko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Oscar Otte
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Torebko vs Oscar Otte, Überlingen 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research