Nicolas Santos vs Rafael Matos, Curitiba 2016, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
4-6 6-3 6-2Venue and conditions
Graciosa Country ClubCuritiba, BRA
Outdoor hardCourt speed92.3Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 10m1Aces1
2Double faults8
48Service points won40
14Service games played13
9Service games won6
13Return games played14
3/838%Break points saved22%2/9
7/978%Break points converted63%5/8
Head to head
2Santos
1Matos
3 meetingsHard 1–0Clay 1–1
- CuritibaQualifying R2 · 27 Aug 2016HardThis matchNicolas SantosSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Rafael MatosSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
- SantosSemifinal · 18 Nov 2017ClayRafael MatosSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Nicolas SantosSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 3
- Córdoba (Argentina)Round of 32 · 13 Jun 2017ClayNicolas SantosSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Rafael MatosSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 63
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.