Vadim Alekseenko vs Nicolas Jarry, Galați 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 26 Aug

Final

Vadim Alekseenko

LostRank #1692

Jarry won in 2 sets · 1h 7m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 22–6

Nicolas Jarry

WinnerRank #784

Venue

Viva Tenis Club

Galați, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

22 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

45%

Comfortable

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

71 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 7m

0Aces5

1Double faults1

24Service points won32

8Service games played8

4Service games won8

8Return games played8

3/743%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted57%4/7

Head to head

0Alekseenko

1Jarry

1 meeting

GalațiQuarterfinal · 26 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Nicolas Jarry
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Vadim Alekseenko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vadim Alekseenko vs Nicolas Jarry, Galați 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research