Daniel Masur vs Marek Gengel, Poznan 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 25 Aug

Final

Daniel Masur

WinnerRank #365

Masur won in 3 sets · 2h 0m

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 23–6

Set 36–3

Marek Gengel

LostRank #423

Venue

AZS Poznan

Poznan, POL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

68%

Moderate

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

66 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 0m

4Aces3

3Double faults6

51Service points won46

14Service games played13

12Service games won10

13Return games played14

2/450%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

1Masur

0Gengel

1 meeting

PoznanRound of 16 · 25 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Daniel Masur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Marek Gengel
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Masur vs Marek Gengel, Poznan 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research