Simon Carr vs Luca Tomasetto, Telavi 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 10 Aug

Final

Simon Carr

LostRank #1694

Tomasetto won in 2 sets · 1h 42m

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 22–6

Luca Tomasetto

WinnerRank #1594

Venue

Telavi Tennis Club

Telavi, GEO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

37%

Comfortable

Temperature

31°C

Warm

Altitude

747 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 42m

3Aces6

3Double faults5

35Service points won47

10Service games played10

6Service games won8

10Return games played10

1/520%Break points saved71%5/7

2/729%Break points converted80%4/5

Head to head

0Carr

1Tomasetto

1 meeting

TelaviRound of 16 · 10 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Luca Tomasetto
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Simon Carr
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Simon Carr vs Luca Tomasetto, Telavi 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research