Jules Okala vs Rajko Mladenovic, Tangier 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 10 Aug

Final

Jules Okala

WinnerRank #1885

Okala won in 2 sets · 1h 6m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–2

Rajko Mladenovic

LostRank #1879

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

29 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

—

No reading

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 6m

1Aces3

3Double faults6

37Service points won26

9Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played9

2/450%Break points saved38%3/8

5/863%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

1Okala

0Mladenovic

1 meeting

TangierRound of 16 · 10 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Jules Okala
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Rajko Mladenovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jules Okala vs Rajko Mladenovic, Tangier 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research