Jan Choinski vs Florian Broska, Wetzlar 2016, Round of 32
Final score
Final
7-6(2) 6-2
Venue and conditions
TC Wetzlar 1912Wetzlar, GER
ClayCourt speed1.9 vs last year88.4Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 49m1Aces3
4Double faults3
37Service points won27
10Service games played10
6Service games won4
10Return games played10
0/40%Break points saved40%4/10
6/1060%Break points converted100%4/4
Head to head
2Choinski
0Broska
2 meetingsClay 1–0Carpet 1–0
- WetzlarRound of 32 · 9 Aug 2016ClayThis matchJan ChoinskiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Florian BroskaSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 2
- NusslochQuarterfinal · 27 Jan 2023CarpetJan ChoinskiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Florian BroskaSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.