Mats Moraing vs Loic Juszczak, Eupen 2016, Round of 32

Final

Mats Moraing

WinnerATP: 1372

Moraing won in 2 sets · 46m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–1

Loic Juszczak

LostUnranked

KTC EupenEupen, BEL

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

1.589.7Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

17°CMild

16km/hGentle

81%Humid

284mLow

Match stats

46m

7Aces1

1Double faults5

28Service points won20

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Moraing

0Juszczak

1 meeting

EupenRound of 32 · 9 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Mats Moraing
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Loic Juszczak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Form and path

Mats Moraing

No recent matches recorded.

Loic Juszczak0–1

OstendClay

LRound of 32
Romain Sichez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Loic Juszczak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mats Moraing vs Loic Juszczak, Eupen 2016, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research