Reda El Amrani vs Gianni Mina, Tangier 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Fri 5 Aug

Final

Reda El Amrani

WinnerRank #1180

Amrani won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–4

Gianni Mina

LostRank #1460

Venue

Tennis Club Municipal de Tanger

Tangier, MAR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

65%

Moderate

Temperature

32°C

Warm

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 19m

0Aces3

3Double faults0

37Service points won32

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

1/250%Break points saved40%2/5

3/560%Break points converted50%1/2

Head to head

1Amrani

0Mina

1 meeting

TangierSemifinal · 5 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Reda El Amrani
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gianni Mina
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Reda El Amrani vs Gianni Mina, Tangier 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research