Gianni Mina vs David Vega Hernandez, Tangier 2016, Quarterfinal

Final

Gianni Mina

WinnerATP: 1460

Mina won in 2 sets · 1h 26m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–3

David Vega Hernandez

LostATP: 1406

Tennis Club Municipal de TangerTangier, MAR

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

85.2Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

32°CHot

17km/hGentle

69%Moderate

14mSea level

Match stats

1h 26m

2Aces0

0Double faults4

41Service points won30

9Service games played8

9Service games won5

8Return games played9

3/3100%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted0%0/3

Head to head

2Mina

0Hernandez

2 meetings

TangierQuarterfinal · 4 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Gianni Mina
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
David Vega Hernandez
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
WestonRound of 32 · 2014Clay
Gianni Mina
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
David Vega Hernandez
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Gianni Mina vs David Vega Hernandez, Tangier 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research