Julian Ocleppo vs Mateusz Terczynski, Sharm El Sheikh 2016, Round of 16

Final

Julian Ocleppo

LostATP: 1390

Terczynski won in 3 sets · 2h 2m

1–2

Set 12–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–7⁴

Mateusz Terczynski

WinnerATP: 1759

SOHO Racket CenterSharm ElSheikh, EGY

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

4.4102.1Average

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

41°CHot

10km/hLight

29%Dry

36mSea level

Match stats

2h 2m

11Aces8

3Double faults2

61Service points won67

15Service games played14

13Service games won13

14Return games played15

6/875%Break points saved88%7/8

1/813%Break points converted25%2/8

Head to head

0Ocleppo

1Terczynski

1 meeting

Sharm El SheikhRound of 16 · 4 Aug 2016HardThis match
Mateusz Terczynski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Julian Ocleppo
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Julian Ocleppo vs Mateusz Terczynski, Sharm El Sheikh 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research