Rhyne Williams vs Marc Polmans, Decatur 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 4 Aug

Final

Rhyne Williams

LostRank #1583

Polmans won in 2 sets · 2h 27m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–7³

Marc Polmans

WinnerRank #492

Venue

Fairview Park Tennis Complex

Decatur, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

203 m

Low

Match stats

2h 27m

7Aces2

1Double faults5

46Service points won47

11Service games played11

8Service games won9

11Return games played11

6/967%Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted33%3/9

Head to head

0Williams

1Polmans

1 meeting

DecaturRound of 16 · 4 Aug 2016HardThis match
Marc Polmans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Rhyne Williams
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6³

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Rhyne Williams vs Marc Polmans, Decatur 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research