Danylo Kalenichenko vs Corentin Denolly, Trnava 2016, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-0 6-2
Venue and conditions
TC EmpireTrnava, SVK
ClayCourt speed0.1 vs last year90.5Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
59m0Aces1
3Double faults1
15Service points won25
7Service games played7
1Service games won6
7Return games played7
0/60%Break points saved0%0/1
1/1100%Break points converted100%6/6
Head to head
0Kalenichenko
2Denolly
2 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 0–1
- TrnavaSemifinal · 30 Jul 2016ClayThis matchCorentin DenollySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Danylo KalenichenkoSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
- PoitiersQuarterfinal · 15 Mar 2019HardCorentin DenollySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 7Danylo KalenichenkoSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 65
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.