Dragos Dima vs Ronan Joncour, Cluj-Napoca 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 28 Jul

Final

Dragos Dima

WinnerRank #1499

Dima won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–2

Ronan Joncour

LostRank #1759

Venue

Winners Sports Club

Cluj-Napoca, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

347 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 4m

1Aces1

1Double faults5

28Service points won25

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved62%8/13

5/1338%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Dima

0Joncour

1 meeting

Cluj-NapocaQuarterfinal · 28 Jul 2016ClayThis match
Dragos Dima
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ronan Joncour
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dragos Dima vs Ronan Joncour, Cluj-Napoca 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research