Marek Michalicka vs Henri Laaksonen, Prague 2 2016, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-4 6-2Venue and conditions
I. ČLTK PrahaPrague, CZE
ClayCourt speed1.7 vs last year94.8Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 26m3Aces2
1Double faults4
29Service points won41
9Service games played9
4Service games won7
9Return games played9
6/1155%Break points saved75%6/8
2/825%Break points converted45%5/11
Head to head
1Michalicka
2Laaksonen
3 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 1–1
- Prague 2Round of 32 · 25 Jul 2016ClayThis matchHenri LaaksonenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marek MichalickaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- DallasRound of 32 · 2 Feb 2016HardHenri LaaksonenSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Marek MichalickaSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
- Las VegasRound of 32 · 20 Oct 2015HardMarek MichalickaSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Henri LaaksonenSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
Form and path
Marek Michalicka2–4
Poznan CHClay
Braunschweig CHClay
Henri Laaksonen
No recent matches recorded.
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.