Tim Kopinski vs Edan Leshem, Saskatoon 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 7 Jul

Final

Tim Kopinski

LostRank #1773

Leshem won in 2 sets · 1h 18m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Edan Leshem

WinnerRank #1953

Venue

Riverside Badminton and Tennis Club

Saskatoon, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

478 m

Moderate

Match stats

1h 18m

2Aces3

3Double faults2

20Service points won37

8Service games played9

3Service games won7

9Return games played8

0/50%Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted100%5/5

Head to head

0Kopinski

1Leshem

1 meeting

SaskatoonRound of 16 · 7 Jul 2016HardThis match
Edan Leshem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tim Kopinski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Kopinski vs Edan Leshem, Saskatoon 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research