Liang Chi Huang vs Ji Hoon Son, Gimcheon 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 1 Jul

Final · Retired

Liang Chi Huang

LostRank #1762

Son won · Retired · 46m

0–0

Set 14–5

Ji Hoon Son

WinnerRank #1866

Venue

Gimcheon Sports Town Tennis Court

Gimcheon, KOR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

91%

Very humid

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

95 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

46m

1Aces2

1Double faults0

17Service points won11

5Service games played4

2Service games won2

4Return games played5

4/757%Break points saved50%2/4

2/450%Break points converted43%3/7

Head to head

0Huang

1Son

1 meeting

GimcheonSemifinal · 1 Jul 2016HardThis match
Ji Hoon Son
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5
Liang Chi Huang
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4
Liang Chi Huang · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Liang Chi Huang vs Ji Hoon Son, Gimcheon 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research