Jan Mertl vs Zdenek Kolar, Pardubice 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 30 Jun

Final

Jan Mertl

LostRank #1844

Kolar won in 2 sets · 1h 34m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 22–6

Zdenek Kolar

WinnerRank #206

Venue

LTC Pardubice

Pardubice, CZE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

218 m

Low

Match stats

1h 34m

4Aces2

2Double faults5

33Service points won41

10Service games played10

5Service games won8

10Return games played10

5/1050%Break points saved33%1/3

2/367%Break points converted50%5/10

Head to head

0Mertl

1Kolar

1 meeting

PardubiceQuarterfinal · 30 Jun 2016ClayThis match
Zdenek Kolar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Mertl vs Zdenek Kolar, Pardubice 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research