Vladimir Ivanov vs Marc Giner, Kazan 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 30 Jun

Final

Vladimir Ivanov

LostRank #1254

Giner won in 2 sets · 1h 18m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Marc Giner

WinnerRank #1345

Venue

Kazan Tennis Academy

Kazan, RUS· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

66%

Moderate

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

100 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 18m

1Aces1

5Double faults1

30Service points won34

9Service games played9

5Service games won8

9Return games played9

4/850%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted50%4/8

Head to head

0Ivanov

1Giner

1 meeting

KazanQuarterfinal · 30 Jun 2016ClayThis match
Marc Giner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Vladimir Ivanov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vladimir Ivanov vs Marc Giner, Kazan 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research