Peter Polansky vs Raymond Sarmiento, Richmond 2016, Semifinal

Final

Peter Polansky

WinnerATP: 1475

Polansky won in 2 sets · 1h 15m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–4

Raymond Sarmiento

LostATP: 1004

Richmond Country ClubRichmond, CAN

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

100.4Average

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

19°CMild

8km/hLight

78%Humid

2mSea level

Match stats

1h 15m

7Aces5

0Double faults2

41Service points won42

10Service games played10

10Service games won8

10Return games played10

2/2100%Break points saved75%6/8

2/825%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

2Polansky

0Sarmiento

2 meetings

RichmondSemifinal · 25 Jun 2016HardThis match
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Raymond Sarmiento
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
KelownaFinal · 3 Jul 2016Hard
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Raymond Sarmiento
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Polansky vs Raymond Sarmiento, Richmond 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research