Amir Weintraub vs Lukas Lacko, s Hertogenbosch 2016, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
6-2 6-3Venue and conditions
Autotron RosmalenRosmalen, NED
GrassCourt speed1.9 vs last year104.3Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
59m2Aces5
2Double faults4
28Service points won38
9Service games played8
5Service games won8
8Return games played9
2/633%Break points saved100%5/5
0/50%Break points converted67%4/6
Head to head
0Weintraub
3Lacko
3 meetingsGrass 0–1Hard 0–2
- s HertogenboschQualifying R1 · 4 Jun 2016GrassThis matchLukas LackoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Amir WeintraubSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- GimcheonQuarterfinal · 9 May 2014HardLukas LackoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Amir WeintraubSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- TashkentQuarterfinal · 12 Oct 2012HardLukas LackoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Amir WeintraubSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.