Dejan Katic vs Gianluigi Quinzi, Kiseljak 2016, Final

FUTURES · Final · Clay · Sun 29 May

Final

Dejan Katic

LostRank #1839

Quinzi won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Gianluigi Quinzi

WinnerRank #1062

Venue

Tennis Club Elliptic

Gromiljak, BIH· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

490 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 19m

3Aces0

2Double faults2

37Service points won36

9Service games played9

5Service games won8

9Return games played9

10/1471%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted29%4/14

Head to head

0Katic

1Quinzi

1 meeting

KiseljakFinal · 29 May 2016ClayThis match
Gianluigi Quinzi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dejan Katic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dejan Katic vs Gianluigi Quinzi, Kiseljak 2016, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research