Mitchell Krueger vs Connor Farren, Lu'an 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 26 May

Final

Mitchell Krueger

WinnerRank #351

Krueger won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Connor Farren

LostRank #1537

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 30m

5Aces8

3Double faults7

46Service points won39

10Service games played9

10Service games won7

9Return games played10

3/3100%Break points saved82%9/11

2/1118%Break points converted0%0/3

Head to head

1Krueger

0Farren

1 meeting

Lu'anRound of 16 · 26 May 2016HardThis match
Mitchell Krueger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Connor Farren
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mitchell Krueger vs Connor Farren, Lu'an 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research