Daniel Hobart vs Victor Poncelet, Lisbon 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 26 May

Final

Daniel Hobart

WinnerRank #1530

Hobart won in 2 sets · 1h 29m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Victor Poncelet

LostRank #1612

Venue

Lisboa Racket Centre

Lisbon, POR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

102 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 29m

1Aces1

0Double faults2

41Service points won29

9Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played9

5/683%Break points saved50%4/8

4/850%Break points converted17%1/6

Head to head

1Hobart

0Poncelet

1 meeting

LisbonRound of 16 · 26 May 2016HardThis match
Daniel Hobart
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Victor Poncelet
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Hobart vs Victor Poncelet, Lisbon 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research