Pedro Sousa vs Simon Carr, Hammamet 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 19 May

Final

Pedro Sousa

WinnerRank #1188

Sousa won in 2 sets · 1h 25m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–4

Simon Carr

LostRank #1694

Venue

Hotel Sentido Phenicia

Hammamet, TUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 25m

2Aces0

2Double faults2

40Service points won37

10Service games played10

8Service games won6

10Return games played10

1/333%Break points saved60%6/10

4/1040%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

1Sousa

0Carr

1 meeting

HammametRound of 16 · 19 May 2016ClayThis match
Pedro Sousa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Simon Carr
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pedro Sousa vs Simon Carr, Hammamet 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research