Lucas Gomez vs Santiago Maresca, Bucharest 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 19 May

Final

Lucas Gomez

WinnerRank #1472

Gomez won in 2 sets · 1h 48m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–4

Santiago Maresca

LostRank #1974

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 48m

1Aces0

3Double faults1

42Service points won27

9Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played9

10/1283%Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted17%2/12

Head to head

1Gomez

0Maresca

1 meeting

BucharestRound of 16 · 19 May 2016ClayThis match
Lucas Gomez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Santiago Maresca
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lucas Gomez vs Santiago Maresca, Bucharest 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research