Kevin Krawietz vs Kyle Edmund, Rome Challenger 2016, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 4 May

Final

Kevin Krawietz

LostRank #843

Edmund won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Kyle Edmund

WinnerRank #704

Venue

Tennis Club Garden

Rome, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

59%

Moderate

Temperature

22°C

Mild

Altitude

63 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 19m

4Aces3

2Double faults3

32Service points won43

9Service games played10

6Service games won9

10Return games played9

2/540%Break points saved89%8/9

1/911%Break points converted60%3/5

Head to head

0Krawietz

1Edmund

1 meeting

Rome ChallengerRound of 16 · 4 May 2016ClayThis match
Kyle Edmund
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Krawietz
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kevin Krawietz vs Kyle Edmund, Rome Challenger 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research