Kenny De Schepper vs Blaz Rola, Rome Challenger 2016, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 4 May

Final

Kenny De Schepper

LostRank #1019

Rola won in 2 sets · 49m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 20–6

Blaz Rola

WinnerRank #1623

Venue

Tennis Club Garden

Rome, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

59%

Moderate

Temperature

22°C

Mild

Altitude

63 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

49m

1Aces3

2Double faults0

11Service points won31

6Service games played7

1Service games won7

7Return games played6

2/729%Break points saved100%3/3

0/30%Break points converted71%5/7

Head to head

0Schepper

1Rola

1 meeting

Rome ChallengerRound of 16 · 4 May 2016ClayThis match
Blaz Rola
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kenny De Schepper
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kenny De Schepper vs Blaz Rola, Rome Challenger 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research