Benjamin Bonzi vs Antoine Bellier, Doha 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 21 Apr

Final

Benjamin Bonzi

LostRank #100

Bellier won in 2 sets · 48m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Antoine Bellier

WinnerRank #1621

Venue

Khalifa International Tennis and Squash Complex

Doha, QAT· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Match stats

48m

0Aces4

4Double faults2

27Service points won28

9Service games played8

4Service games won7

8Return games played9

3/838%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted63%5/8

Head to head

0Bonzi

1Bellier

1 meeting

DohaQuarterfinal · 21 Apr 2016HardThis match
Antoine Bellier
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Benjamin Bonzi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Benjamin Bonzi vs Antoine Bellier, Doha 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research