Tomislav Brkic vs Ilya Ivashka, Bukhara 2016, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 15 Apr

Final

Tomislav Brkic

LostRank #1195

Ivashka won in 2 sets · 1h 45m

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 24–6

Ilya Ivashka

WinnerRank #220

Venue

Dilkusho Tennis Complex

Bukhara, UZB· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

43%

Comfortable

Temperature

32°C

Warm

Altitude

226 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 45m

5Aces8

1Double faults1

52Service points won51

11Service games played11

9Service games won10

11Return games played11

7/978%Break points saved83%5/6

1/617%Break points converted22%2/9

Head to head

0Brkic

1Ivashka

1 meeting

BukharaSemifinal · 15 Apr 2016HardThis match
Ilya Ivashka
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Tomislav Brkic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tomislav Brkic vs Ilya Ivashka, Bukhara 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research