Scott Griekspoor vs Kunal Anand, Manama 2016, Quarterfinal

Final

Scott Griekspoor

WinnerATP: 1195

Griekspoor won in 3 sets · 2h 20m

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 24–6

Set 36–2

Kunal Anand

LostATP: 1612

Bahrain Tennis ClubManama, BRN

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

1.196.6Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

22°CWarm

45km/hStrong

55%Moderate

4mSea level

Match stats

2h 20m

2Aces1

7Double faults1

70Service points won54

14Service games played13

12Service games won9

13Return games played14

8/1080%Break points saved73%11/15

4/1527%Break points converted20%2/10

Head to head

1Griekspoor

0Anand

1 meeting

ManamaQuarterfinal · 31 Mar 2016HardThis match
Scott Griekspoor
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Kunal Anand
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Scott Griekspoor vs Kunal Anand, Manama 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research