Joris De Loore vs Lenny Hampel, Hammamet 2016, Quarterfinal

Final

Joris De Loore

WinnerATP: 1996

Loore won in 2 sets · 1h 25m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 27–5

Lenny Hampel

LostATP: 1335

Hotel Sentido PheniciaHammamet, TUN

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

87.6Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

17°CMild

18km/hGentle

75%Humid

7mSea level

Match stats

1h 25m

5Aces0

3Double faults6

38Service points won33

9Service games played10

9Service games won6

10Return games played9

1/1100%Break points saved20%1/5

4/580%Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

1Loore

0Hampel

1 meeting

HammametQuarterfinal · 18 Mar 2016ClayThis match
Joris De Loore
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Lenny Hampel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Joris De Loore vs Lenny Hampel, Hammamet 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research