Bogdan Borza vs Zdenek Kolar, Poreč 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 11 Mar

Final

Bogdan Borza

LostRank #1862

Kolar won in 2 sets · 1h 14m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 23–6

Zdenek Kolar

WinnerRank #203

Venue

Tennis Center Pical

Poreč, CRO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

69%

Moderate

Temperature

12°C

Cool

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 14m

1Aces4

7Double faults4

34Service points won36

9Service games played10

5Service games won8

10Return games played9

5/956%Break points saved50%2/4

2/450%Break points converted44%4/9

Head to head

0Borza

1Kolar

1 meeting

PorečQuarterfinal · 11 Mar 2016ClayThis match
Zdenek Kolar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Bogdan Borza
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bogdan Borza vs Zdenek Kolar, Poreč 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research